RELATIONSHIP APPEALS OFFICE // CASE AI-08
PERSONAL JUDGEMENT REVIEW
Your choices stay in this page and are not sent with Analytics. No messages, names, relationship details, or pasted conversations are requested.
Eight choices. One private calculation. Zero emotional subpoenas.
The judgement is in.
This is satire about using AI as a referee in personal disagreements, not medical, legal, professional, or relationship advice or diagnosis.
About This Game
AI As A Relationship Referee Verdict is a private, satirical self-judgement about asking AI to referee a human disagreement. It does not inspect a conversation, determine who was right, or judge another person. Instead, eight fixed choices look at how often you request an AI verdict, repeat an AI appeal, delegate a decision, escalate ordinary conflict, explain your own reasoning without citing AI, and change your view when evidence contradicts an AI ruling. The result turns only those choices into a playful score, verdict band, archetype, and two dominant findings.
How It Works
Choose the answer that matches your usual behaviour on each of eight screens. Every option is a native radio control with an explicit label, and the Back button returns to an earlier item without deleting its selection. The final button validates the complete answer set before the browser calculates the score. AI consultation frequency, decision delegation, conflict escalation, retained self-authorship, and willingness to request another AI verdict use fixed published weights. The same eight answers always produce the same integer score, band, archetype, findings, and recommendation. Calculation happens locally; the game discusses AI use but does not send anything to an AI service. There is no signup, network scoring request, pasted text field, relationship profile, or hidden randomization.
What Your Result Includes
The completed file shows an AI Judgement Outsourcing Score from 0 to 100 and one of five labels: Occasional Consultant, Licensed Outsourcer, Third-Party Referee, Appeal Court Regular, or Emotionally Incorporated. It also names one of four archetypes, lists AI consultation frequency, decision delegation, and retained self-authorship metrics, explains the two strongest contributing patterns, and issues one comic recommendation. Share and download controls create a result-only card containing the title, score, label, archetype, branding, and canonical game address. Raw answer values never appear in the public share text or image.
Frequently Asked Questions
How is the score calculated?
Eight fixed answers use deterministic AI consultation frequency, decision delegation, conflict escalation, self-authorship risk, and AI re-prompt weights, plus a fixed two-point completion baseline. The final value is rounded and clamped from 0 to 100.
Are my answers saved?
No. Answer selections remain in page memory for the current run and disappear when you restart, navigate away, or close the page.
Is this a real relationship assessment?
No. It is entertainment and cannot decide who was right, evaluate another person, or replace a direct conversation or professional advice.
Does the game read messages or use an AI service?
No. It requests no messages, screenshots, names, contacts, or account access. The score is calculated entirely in your browser from fixed multiple-choice values.